Daniel De Jonge
To Win first set
Joao Graca
To Win first set
Daniel De Jonge
To win 2-0
Joao Graca
To win 2-0
Daniel De Jonge
To win 2-1
Joao Graca
To win 2-1
over 20
Games
Prediction of Daniel De Jonge [] vs Joao Graca [] Head-to-Head At The 2025 M15 Sanxenxo (04-23-25)
By Wojtek Kolan - April 22, 2025
Jonge is scheduled to play Graca on Wednesday at 10:00 AM CET, in the M15 Sanxenxo, First round.
Form
W W L W W W L W W L
Form
L L L W W W L L L WJonge vs. Graca Forecast
Calculated from the implied probability from the moneyline, Jonge has a 73.47% chance to win.
BE AWARE: Subscribe to the Matchstat.com tennis predictions club to reveal implied and actual predictions to get access to profitable bets so you can make successful bets.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Joao Graca | 32.15 % |
| Daniel De Jonge | 73.47 % |
|
Above is calculated from odds. Login now to get our expert predictions. |
H2H: Jonge 0 - 0 Graca
| Jonge | Stats | Graca |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (20-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (10-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 25 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (120-92) | Career Total W/L | 41% (43-61) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
23 Apr 2025 / First
Daniel De Jonge implied favourite from odds → 73.47%
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
Edge
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Current Event Stats
M15 Sanxenxo
Hard| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1st Match | Total Matches | 1 |
| 1st Match | Last Match | 0:00:00 |
| 1st Match | Total Time | 0:00:00 |
| 1st Match | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 1st Match | Aces Total | 0 |
| 1st Match | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1st Match | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Total Break Points Saved | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Service Hold (%) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Opponent Hold % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Total Points Won | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Tiebreak Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/0) |
| 1st Match | Tiebreaks Per Match | 0.00 |
| 1st Match | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel De Jonge vs Joao Graca Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jonge 0 - 0 Graca
Editorial Prediction:
In evaluating the upcoming tennis match, analyzing both players' recent performances is crucial for predicting the outcome. Over the last six months, Graca has displayed a superior second serve performance, winning 47.1% of points compared to Jonge's 39.97%. This statistic frequently correlates with accurate match outcome predictions.
When it comes to return games, Graca again has a slight edge by claiming 47.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has captured 47.24%. In first serve returns, Jonge is marginally better at 24.15% compared to Graca's 24%. These return stats play a vital role in assessing which player might be favored in head-to-head matchups.
An essential element of match prediction is analyzing players' performances under pressure, particularly in breakpoint scenarios. Jonge has saved 56.76% of breakpoints in recent matches, outperforming Graca, who has saved 46.05%. Furthermore, when converting breakpoints, Graca shows significant strength, capitalizing on 50% of opportunities versus Jonge's 30.23%.
Overall match performance in the past year demonstrates that both Jonge and Graca have similar success rates, with Jonge winning 57.69% of matches (30 wins to 22 losses) and Graca achieving a 57.5% win rate (23 wins to 17 losses). This parity in winning percentages adds depth to predicting which player might prevail.
Examining surface preferences, Jonge achieves his highest win percentage on indoor hard courts—64%—while his weakest is on clay with 53%. Graca, in contrast, excels on hard courts, winning 42% and falters on clay with a 33% win rate. Understanding these preferences can provide insight into expected performance depending on the playing surface.
Additionally, the level of competition faced by each player could influence the outcome. Jonge's average opponent ranking was 332.67, while Graca faced tougher competition with an average ranking of 177.15 over the past 12 months, representing a higher competitive standard.
In deciding sets, vital for potential live betting, Graca has shown stronger performance, clinching 67% of deciding sets compared to Jonge's 50%. Lastly, a particular attention to how both players perform in ongoing events should be made since such factors also contribute to identifying in-form players.
Taking these statistics into consideration, Graca appears to have the upper hand in various metrics, suggesting a higher likelihood of victory in the upcoming match given his superior second serve performance, breakpoint conversion rate, and prowess in deciding sets. Therefore, based on these analyses, Graca is likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.
Daniel De Jonge vs Joao Graca Best Odds For The Match
To Win
Graca
+211
Jonge
-277
To Win first set
Jonge
-222
Graca
+161
To win 2-0
Jonge
-117
Graca
-113
Daniel De Jonge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Axel Garcian
Player
Daniel De Jonge
47%
(
41 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
10
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Tristan Berard
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Yoshka Sborowsky
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
75 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
15
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
46 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
129
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ismael Soussi
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Evan Jarzaguet
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Lapadat
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Milavsky
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ronald Hohmann
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Joao Graca Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Joao Graca
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(8) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Joao Graca
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve %
71%
(
12 of
17)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
27
Total Points Won
9
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Antonio Serrano Luis
Player
Joao Graca
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Curras Abasolo
Player
Joao Graca
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
13
Total Points Won
10
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Jonge vs Graca?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Jonge Vs Graca is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (29/24) | Win/Loss | 42% (42/59) |
| 53% (60/54) | Sets Win/Loss | 43% (95/126) |
| 52% (560/510) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (958/1076) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 119 | Aces Total | 85 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 205 | Total Double Faults | 56 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 330.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 207.3 |
| 54% (1095/2028) | 1st Serve % | 55% (1003/1818) |
| 69% (755/1095) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (649/1003) |
| 43% (397/933) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (361/815) |
| 48% (92/192) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (56/141) |
| 41% (820/2003) | Return Points Win % | 36% (627/1766) |
| 54% (28/52) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (41/98) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (2/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 71% (12/17) |
| 67% (6/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 93% (29/27) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (41/34) |
| 7% (29/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (41/7) |
| 8% (24/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (60/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
